RFC 4590

[Alan DeKok]

Peter Nixon <listuser at peternixon.net> wrote:
> >   Please don't do *anything* with RFC 4590.  It's existence is a
> > figment of your imagination.  Once the updated RFC comes out, we'll
> > use that.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4590.txt ???

  <g> The IETF RADIUS group decided last week that RFC 4590 was a lost
cause, and would be re-issued with corrected numbers.  In the mean
time, implementations of RFC 4590 are based at least in part on
guesses and inference, rather than a standard.

  Alan DeKok.
--
  http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
  http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog