SQL usergroup table
guy at incentre.net
Fri Sep 22 20:40:11 CEST 2006
On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 10:28 -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Peter Nixon <listuser at peternixon.net> wrote:
> > Is there any reason why the "usergroup" table is not calle d"radgroup" by
> > default to fit with the other radius tables?
> No idea. Let's try to be consistent in 2.0.
Is it not because it maps users to groups ?
"radgroup" could refer to any kind of group association but
I can't think of any reason why it couldn't be changed,
except that a note in really large letters should be put on
the download page to ensure administrators don't get miffed
when upgrading, and possibly getting bitten by the change.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel