aland at deployingradius.com
Thu Jul 19 17:35:44 CEST 2007
Peter Nixon wrote:
> Now, to me it makes sense to keep the CoA secret in the NAS table (or
> clients.conf) as a RADIUS client and a CoA server are almost always going to
> share information (ie. be the same thing) and in cases where they are not we
> could either leave out the CoA secret or the RADIUS shared secret..
> With that logic I plan to add a "coasecret" field to the NAS table (same can
> be done for clients.conf). Does anyone have anything against this plan?
For 2.0, the NAS table should also have a "listener" or "virtual
server" key. Clients can have different shared secrets with each socket
that the server is listening on...
More information about the Freeradius-Devel