SQL config file names

[Alan DeKok]

Peter Nixon wrote:
> Why? What is the benefit of making people import two schema's instead of one? 
> I don't see how having one extra, possibly unused table in the default 
> schema is at all harmfull, and in my opinion the added "cleanliness" does 
> not make up for the extra command every user will have to type when they 
> want to setup sqlippool (Which I believe is going to be a wildly popular 
> module in the near future :-)

  That's what documentation && makefiles are for.

  We could have "make install-schema" which installs the schemas.  At
that point, it doesn't matter if they're in one file, or 10,000 files.

  Alan DeKok.