EAP proxing with client-balance

[Alexander Clouter]

Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:
>
> Alexander Clouter wrote:
>> After posting I thought it should be left in but the 'rcode != 0' should 
>> be expanded to have a warning explaining that the upstream load-balancer 
>> needs to be cremated. :)
>> 
>> If I put together the trivial patch, would it be desired?
> 
>  Sounds good to me.
> 
I see you beat me to it on the patches.  Sorry I was slow, this past 
week or so has been horrible :-/

Cheers

-- 
Alexander Clouter
.sigmonster says: A tautology is a thing which is tautological.