2.1.8 and 2.2.0

[Alan DeKok]

Alan Buxey wrote:
> we already have 2 versions that people get confused and want support on..

  Version numbers keep going up, not down.

> however, i would be happy to have 2.1.8 and 2.2.0 for the short term - because
> 2.1.x train is one that everyone is familiar with and works in the 2.1.x way
> where-as - as you say, 2.2.x will have new features, methods etc - it would
> make sense , then to say 2.1.8 for the small upgraders and 2.2.x for those wanting
> the new features/methods etc.   ..and can we say goodbye to all 1.x 'support' ? :-)

  Ok.... We can do 2.1.8 with minor changes over 2.1.7.  Then, 2.2.0
with major changes (TCP, etc.)

  Alan DeKok.