RadSec ... anyone?

[Alexander Clouter]

Alan Buxey <A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Indeed, Alan Buxley et al, seemed to be the ones most interested in 
>> it for ORPS to NRPS stuff. You're a member of the JANET 802.1X SIG, 
>> why not poke them for an invite?
> 
> dont worry Arran, I'm aware of the recent update to support RADSEC but 
> have been busy (indeed, pretty much out of office for past couple of 
> weeks) - looking forward to running the new engine and getting packets 
> from a FR running RADSEC :-)
> 
Apparently by moving to RADSEC we will have to embrace SMNPesque traffic 
wrapped in XML, wrapped in SOAP, wrapped in HTTP, aka IF-MAP...  I also 
suspect I have to fill out a stack of parchment with a quill and ship 
the permission slips via the Mayflower to get a signed cert for my 
organisation.

Happy to be proven wrong though :)

Cheers

-- 
Alexander Clouter
.sigmonster says: To the landlord belongs the doorknobs.