freeradius: failed linking to rlm_eap2

[Stelian Ionescu]

On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:40 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
[...]
> http://xkcd.com/927/
> 
> ...nicely summarises my thinking on the matter.
> 
> It has has a few small advantages. None are compelling to me, and I 
> think I'm pretty typical. Why would someone in my position move away 
> from TEAP?
> 
> More to the point, why would someone in my position spend hundreds of 
> man-hours deciphering the TEAP RFC and writing the code, when it's 
> notably more complex than PEAP for little gain?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-01 says that
TEAP is "based on EAP-FAST [RFC4851] with some minor changes", of which
you can find implementations around

-- 
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-devel/attachments/20120917/8250cd46/attachment-0001.pgp>