master build failure

Phil Mayers p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Wed Feb 20 18:41:16 CET 2013


On 20/02/13 17:38, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 20/02/13 16:43, Alan DeKok wrote:
>
>>    I put const to the left, to highlight the fact that the variable
>> declarations are parsed right to left:
>>
>>    X is a pointer to a CONF_PARSER which is const
>>
>> which is the same as:
>>
>>    X is a pointer to a const CONF_PARSER
>
> Really? I read the first as:
>
> (x is a pointer to a conf parser) which is const
>
> i.e. "x", the pointer, is const. Not what is pointed to.
>
> I'm going by this:
>
> http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/const-ptr-vs-ptr-const.html
>
> ...which sits in my bookmarks. But I freely admit to finding const in C
> confusing.
>
> However - there is now some evidence that my build was screwed, and the
> 3.0.0 server was somehow loading an older 3.0.0 build

...sorry, "an older rlm_eap_tls"


More information about the Freeradius-Devel mailing list