talloc & threads in rlm_eap

[Phil Mayers]

On 23/06/2014 22:37, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:

> Note that this wasn't the original bug, I only added VERIFY_REQUEST
> to process.c after your initial report.

Oh sure; that (totally non-obvious) talloc restriction was definitely 
biting with different symptoms.

> It real issue was not breaking up the ctx trees correctly and not
> using the NULL ctx.

It might just be slowly ramping up to stable use w.r.t. cached SSL 
sessions, but FYI the memory usage is very slowly climbing for the 
process; I'll leave it until tomorrow, but hopefully my repeated nagging 
hasn't lost us a talloc_free somewhere...