Multiple secrets for 0.0.0.0/0

[Jason Frisvold]

On 1/31/06, Benjamin Bennett <ben at psc.edu> wrote:
> yes, but that requires defining each client more precisely than /0. For
> example x.x.x.x/32 and y.y.y.y/32.

*oh*  Ok, gotcha..  That didn't dawn on me as I specify each client
individually..  Just feels more secure that way..

> His initial question seemed to imply belief that clients.conf determines
> what addresses radiusd binds to, I think that's where the
> misunderstanding is coming from.

Yep..  That sounds about right..

> --ben

--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
XenoPhage0 at gmail.com