Re: Freeradius 1.1.1: 'sqlippools' concurrency problems
"Robles Rodriguez,Alejandro" <Alejandro.RoblesRodriguez@tre.se> wrote:
> That would be the case if I only had one single radiusd running, however as
> already mentioned this solution encompasses a number of radius servers each with its
> own mysql server adn the same storage (NDB cluster) behind the scenes i.e. virtually
> sharing data storage.
Then I suggest using a database that doesn't have concurrency problems.
The ONLY way you will see this problem is if the database doesn't
support multiple simultaneous writers.
Alan DeKok.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.