Re: rlm_detail and radrelay concurrence

To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>
Subject: Re: rlm_detail and radrelay concurrence
From: "Alan DeKok" <aland@nitros9.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:28:22 -0400
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:09:57 +0200." <20060615100957.GG3036@asuka.tech.sitadelle.com>
Reply-to: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>
Sender: aland@nitros9.org

Nicolas Baradakis <nbk@sitadelle.com> wrote:
> I think the fixes are in CVS head but they were never included in any
> stable release.

  Whoops, that's a bug.  It should be fixed in both rlm_Detail &
radrelay.

  Alan DEKok.

References:
- Re: rlm_detail and radrelay concurrence
  - From: Nicolas Baradakis <nbk@sitadelle.com>

Previous by Date: RFC violations (was Re: \000 in "octets" attribute? )
Next by Date: rlm_perl forking zombies
Previous by Thread: Re: rlm_detail and radrelay concurrence
Next by Thread: rlm_detail bug when "locking = yes"
Freeradius-Users June 2006 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Freeradius-Users list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.