The value
field of this attribute begins with the 2-byte RES Length,which identifies the exact length of the RES in bits. The RES length is followed by the AKA RES parameter. According to [TS33.105], the length of the AKA RES can vary between 32 and 128 bits. Because the length of the AT_RES attribute must be a multiple of 4 bytes, the sender pads the RES with zero bits where necessary
Trace below is packet from client to
server:-
0x024200301701000003050000d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d0d00b0500 000d6eb3a8082c9d2c0a031505b7a0fac0
c) As per section 3 (Figure 2) from RFC 4187, if server is unable to authenticate client if AT_MAC or AT_RES is incorrect, it should back the EAP-Request/AKA-Notification to client and client should respond
back with EAP-Response/AKA-Notification. Then only server should send back EAP result as Failure. But Freeradius1.1.2 sends back the EAP Result (FAILURE) with Access-Reject. How ever success scenarion works perfectly.
d) After receiving AKA-Challenge from Radius server, does patch supports the checking of Sequence No from AUTN parameter?
Do we have any latest patch to support EAP-AKA?
Thanks
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.