Re: Redundant Ldap Configuration + More groups
Hi Alan,
Thanks for your information.
Regards,
Nikitha
On 2/17/07, Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com
> wrote:nikitha wrote:
> When the request comes to the radius server, it goes one entry by entry
> in "users" file, ie., It connects to ldap-server-1 with the Ldap-Group
> tries from g1 till g20, and then connects to ldap-server-2 with
> Ldap-Group from "g21' till g50. If the user is part of Ldap-group "g50"
> it takes more time to return success, before itself the request times
> out, and received eap start again from wireless client.
Yes. The LDAP query results aren't cached.
> If the "number of DEFAULT entry for ldap-server-1" is less than 10, then
> it works fine. If the default entry increases, the server takes more
> time to process.
Yes, the solution is to not configure so many queries that the server
slows down.
> I think redundant ldap server configuration is not correct or in some
> otherway we can fix it. Is it possible to configure the radius server in
> such a way that, try ldap-server-1 for the first policy, if its
> reachable then check it against the next policy.
For LDAP-Group checking, no.
> If its not reachable mark this server as dead or whatever and ignore
> processing the next coming DEFAULT entries which matches with
> ldap-server-1 and try to process ldap-server-2 entries.
That may be possible with source code patches. i.e. If an LDAP server
is marked "dead", don't try to contact it for a few seconds. That would
help your configuration a lot. But your configuration is an artificial
one that highlights a problem.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/
- The blog
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc.