Plug-in Question

[Phil Mayers]

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:49 +0200, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Stefan Winter wrote:
> > It's a long shot, but: wouldn't it make sense to clear the wording for 2.0? I 
> > know, it would break all existing configs out there, but manually working 
> > through the config is needed anyways...
> > I know that this wording startled me quite a bit when I was new here...
> 
>   It's worth doing.
> 
>   The problem is we can't call the post-authentication step "authorize",
> because that will confuse everyone upgrading from 1.x.
> 
>   I think the default configuration should be "pre-auth", "auth", and
> "post-auth".  We can still accept "authorize" as a synonym for
> "pre-auth" in the short term.

+1 - excellent idea