RE: Radiusd -X start vs Radiusd start

To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>
Subject: RE: Radiusd -X start vs Radiusd start
From: J-P Raymond <vectorw16@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 11:45:06 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <472BB432.3080806@deployingradius.com>
References: <BAY114-W222A001E9B1C62A8D89B0A68D0@phx.gbl> <472BB432.3080806@deployingradius.com>
Reply-to: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>

Set "reject_delay" = 0 was my problem !

Thanks for your answer Alan

> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 00:35:14 +0100
start vs Radiusd start

> >
> > When I : radiusd -X start the process work fine
> >
> > When I : radiusd start the process times out ???
>
> Set "reject_delay = 0".
>
> It's fixed in 2.0-pre, but it should also be fixed in 1.x.
>
> Alan DeKok.
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Envoie un sourire, fais rire, amuse-toi! Employez-le maintenant!

References:
- Radiusd -X start vs Radiusd start
  - From: J-P Raymond <vectorw16@hotmail.com>
- Re: Radiusd -X start vs Radiusd start
  - From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>

Previous by Date: Re: [resolved] segfault when router attempts to authenticate against radiusd - modcall: entering group authorize for request 0
Next by Date: wpa_supplicant
Previous by Thread: Re: Radiusd -X start vs Radiusd start
Next by Thread: Re: radiusd deadlock on recvfrom on port 1814
Freeradius-Users November 2007 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Freeradius-Users list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.