Q: on attr_filter.accounting_response

[Ivan Kalik]

RFC 2866:

No attributes should be found in Accounting-Response packets except
Proxy-State and possibly Vendor-Specific.

Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP



Dana 22/4/2008, "rsg" <ranil.santhish at gmail.com> piše:

>Hi,
>
>I'm using FR 2.0.2. I require that the Accounting response includes
>"Reply-Message",
>
>Could one simply add
>
>Reply-Message =* ANY
>
>into ../raddb/attrs.accounting_response file to achieve?
>
>...
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Accounting Section:
>
>accounting {
>        #
>        #  Create a 'detail'ed log of the packets.
>        #  Note that accounting requests which are proxied
>        #  are also logged in the detail file.
>        detail
>
>        #  Return an address to the IP Pool when we see a stop record.
>#       main_pool
>         sqlippool
>        #
>        #  Log traffic to an SQL database.
>        #
>        #  See "Accounting queries" in sql.conf
>        #sql
>
>        #
>        #  Instead of sending the query to the SQL server,
>        #  write it into a log file.
>        #
>        #sql_log
>
>        #  Cisco VoIP specific bulk accounting
>        #pgsql-voip
>
>        #  Filter attributes from the accounting response.
>        attr_filter.accounting_response
>
>        #
>        #  See "Autz-Type Status-Server" for how this works.
>        #
>#       Acct-Type Status-Server {
>#
>#       }
>}
>------------------------------------------------------
>
>I see that Reply-Message is supressed only
>
>Proxy-State is carried by the accounting response
>
>
>
>excerpt of packet Capture:
>-------------
>Radius Protocol
>    Code: Accounting-Response (5)
>    Packet identifier: 0xd (13)
>    Length: 26
>    Authenticator: A6D7BFC84BEF5B6A8B1047F4435DAA16
>    Attribute Value Pairs
>        AVP: l=6  t=Proxy-State(33): 30303064
>            Proxy-State: 30303064
>-----------------
>
>Commenting "attr_filter.accounting_response" from the accounting
>section has the same effect.
>
>What have I done missed in this? Thanks in advance for your help.
>-
>List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>
>