Re: Radius Load-Balancing concept
To
: "FreeRadius users mailing list" <
freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
>
Subject
: Re: Radius Load-Balancing concept
From
: "liran tal" <
liransgarage@gmail.com
>
Date
: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:54:13 +0100
In-reply-to
: <
001201c84e1d$a9c4e350$1601a8c0@conxxus.com
>
References
: <
47882.80.241.192.17.1199356286.squirrel@webmail.gp-is.net
> <
001201c84e1d$a9c4e350$1601a8c0@conxxus.com
>
Reply-to
: FreeRadius users mailing list <
freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
>
Hey Duane,
On Jan 3, 2008 4:31 PM, Duane Cox <
duanec@mail.illicom.net
> wrote:
I'm doing this with no problem.
I have 2 freeradius servers both writing/reading the same dbms
In a case where the entire transaction goes through one server it's ok,
but if it gets split up through the two of them, then I'm not sure what
will be the outcome.
Regards,
Liran.
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Radius Load-Balancing concept
From:
"Sebastian Ganschow" <sebastian@ganschow.name>
References
:
Radius Load-Balancing concept
From:
"Sebastian Ganschow" <sebastian@ganschow.name>
RE: Radius Load-Balancing concept
From:
"Duane Cox" <duanec@mail.illicom.net>
Previous by Date:
Re: Problem with pptp and freeradius
Next by Date:
Re: Problem with pptp and freeradius
Previous by Thread:
RE: Radius Load-Balancing concept
Next by Thread:
Re: Radius Load-Balancing concept
Freeradius-Users January 2008 archives indexes sorted by:
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ date ]
Freeradius-Users list archive
Table of Contents
More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list
This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc
.