Re: proxy-to-realm versus using a suffix

To: "FreeRadius users mailing list" <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>
Subject: Re: proxy-to-realm versus using a suffix
From: "Ivan Kalik" <tnt@kalik.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:20:14 +0100
Bounce-to: "Ivan Kalik" <tnt@kalik.net>
In-reply-to: <4873F093.3090605@nd.edu>
Reply-to: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>

>I would like to add the realm name to specific RADIUS traffic either by
>IP address, EAP type or NAS-Port-Type.
>
>If there is a better way to do this in 2.0.4-5, please let me know.
>

http://freeradius.org/radiusd/man/unlang.html

Ivan Kalik
Kalik Informatika ISP

References:
- Re: proxy-to-realm versus using a suffix
  - From: Chris Fruehwirth <cfruehwi@nd.edu>

Previous by Date: Re: proxy-to-realm versus using a suffix
Next by Date: RE: Dynamic VLANs based on AD group membership
Previous by Thread: Re: proxy-to-realm versus using a suffix
Next by Thread: Re: proxy-to-realm versus using a suffix
Freeradius-Users July 2008 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Freeradius-Users list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.