Re: Auth-Test accounts in "users" file





Alan DeKok wrote:
James McOrmond wrote:
Is it possible/appropriate to have some test accounts in the "users"
file, along with an Auth-Type set to which auth type this account can be
used for?

  Yes.  But don't set Auth-Type.  Please.
you seem to have a real issue with it :-)

We're testing a client that we're building (based on wpa_supplicant on
linux), so would like to confirm the different auth methods are actually
connecting as configured.

  I would say to use 2.0.  The new "unlang" policy language makes this
much easier.

I was thinking something like:

test-pap   Auth-Type = PAP, User-Password := "pap-test"
test-chap Auth-Type = CHAP, User-Password := "chap-test"

  Or...

 if (User-Name == "test-pap") {
	if (User-Password)  {
		update control {
			Cleartext-Password := "pap-test"
		}
        }
	else {
		# test failed, do something...
		reject
	}
 }


  It's a lot more verbose, but also a lot clearer, I think.
I specifically want the test-pap account to fail if the authentication method used is anything but pap. I don't see that restriction here.


--
James A. McOrmond (jamesm@xandros.com)
Network Administrator
Xandros Corporation, Ottawa, Canada.
Morpheus: ...after a century of war I remember that which matters most:
*We are still HERE!*





This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.