FreeRADIUS 2 not listening on right port

[Casartello, Thomas]

Yeah I just compiled without optimization and its working fine now.

Thomas E. Casartello, Jr.
Infrastructure Technician
Linux Specialist
Department of Information Technology
Westfield State College
Wilson 105-A
(413) 572-8245
E-Mail: tcasartello at wsc.ma.edu

Red Hat Certified Technician (RHCT)


-----Original Message-----
From:
freeradius-users-bounces+tcasartello=wsc.ma.edu at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+tcasartello=wsc.ma.edu at lists.freeradius
.org] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 10:49 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: FreeRADIUS 2 not listening on right port

Alan DeKok wrote:
> Michael Griego wrote:
>> I did a little looking into this this evening.  This assessment looks
to
>> be correct as it looks to be related to compiler optimizations.  With
>> the optimizations disabled in Make.inc, FreeRADIUS will start up on
the
>> correct port.  For the fr_socket function, gcc appears to be
optimizing
>> the arguments by sending them through the registers instead of the
stack
>> frame, but the "port" argument is being clobbered ("optimized out")
>> before the htons(port) call.  Specifically, according to a
step-through
>> with GDB, after the first function call in fr_socket (which is to
>> socket()), the port variable is gone ("optimized out").
> 
>   <sigh>  I've started testing the server with other compilers.  GCC
is
> getting too ugly for my liking.
> 
>   I'll put a note on the main web page.: DON'T USE -O2 ON FEDORA!

I can confirm this; I've opened a bug in the Fedora bugzilla:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446864

...with any luck, the toolchain will get fixed - it's clearly not a 
FreeRadius bug, and I wonder what else it's broken...
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html