rlm_perl behavior

[Apostolos Pantsiopoulos]

If any changes are to be made to the current
implementation to support multiple interpreters (one per thread)
would they show up in a 2.1.x release or a future one (2.2.x or something)?

Meyers, Dan wrote:
>>>>  It should be running one Perl thread per system thread.  The
> server
>>>> core already manages min/max spare threads, idle threads, etc.
> <snip>
>>> I hope this implementation will satisfy Borislav too. Will he be
>>> able to
>>> instantiate different perl scripts for different needs?
>>>
>>> So, when do I start testing :)
> 
> Just to say, we're currently using FreeRadius 2.1.3 with rlm_perl in a
> project currently in active development, and having read this i'm
> holding off upgrading to 2.1.4 as we also use the multiple perl threads
> functionality of the module to parallel process and increase throughput.
> We have a specific development server/environment, and would be more
> than happy to test any patches designed to fix this 2.1.4 issue on it.
> 
> --
> Dan Meyers
> Network Specialist, Lancaster University
> E-Mail: d.meyers at lancaster.ac.uk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


-- 
-------------------------------------------
Apostolos Pantsiopoulos
Kinetix Tele.com R & D
email: regs at kinetix.gr
-------------------------------------------