NAS IPs

[Gary Gatten]

If I understand you correctly - I respectfully submit you are incorrect.
When using VLSM / classless masks to define a NETWORK, you are correct
(I haven't checked the math - just assuming you are correct).  However,
when defining ACL type stuff, the proposed /29 would be perfectly OK.
That said, I'm speaking strictly of my experience with routers,
firewalls, etc.  If FR supports this I can't say for sure.

 

________________________________

From: freeradius-users-bounces+ggatten=waddell.com at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+ggatten=waddell.com at lists.freeradius.or
g] On Behalf Of Magui
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:39 PM
To: freeradius-users at lists.freeradius.org
Subject: Re:NAS IPs

 

you can not to use /29 for 8 IPs because 3 bits have exactly 8
combination ,..x000 is the network and ...x111 is the difusion ,then
really you have 6 IPs with /29, you need /28 16 combinations minus
two,min 14 IPs for 8 numbers.






<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'>
</div>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."
</font>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20090820/f3b79091/attachment.html>