NAS IPs

Irina irina at nas.net
Fri Aug 21 15:33:20 CEST 2009


Hello Johan and everyone else.

Thank you very much Johan for your short answer.  Some 
posts have confused me even more than I was when posted to 
the list.  I was blaming on my English, could be I was 
asking it a wrong way.

Anyway, thank you all again.  I am pretty sure you know 
what you are talking about :-))

Irina
==============

Gary Gatten wrote:
> If I understand you correctly – I respectfully submit you are 
> incorrect.  When using VLSM / classless masks to define a NETWORK, you 
> are correct (I haven’t checked the math – just assuming you are 
> correct).  However, when defining ACL type stuff, the proposed /29 
> would be perfectly OK.  That said, I’m speaking strictly of my 
> experience with routers, firewalls, etc.  If FR supports this I can’t say for sure.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> you can not to use /29 for 8 IPs because 3 bits have exactly 8 
> combination ,..x000 is the network and ...x111 is the difusion ,then 
> really you have 6 IPs with /29, you need /28 16 combinations minus 
> two,min 14 IPs for 8 numbers.
>


I think we should stop the TCPIP training.
This is the freeradius list.

The user wants to know if /29 can be used.

The answer is yes.


--


Johan Meiring
Cape PC Services CC
Tel: (021) 883-8271
Fax: (021) 886-7782

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html





 



More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list