MLPPP Acct-Session-Id

Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) jkuhne at cisco.com
Mon Apr 11 17:15:48 CEST 2011


Thank you Arran and Alan for your feedback.
I received confirmation it was not yet implemented on Cisco ASR1k.

-----Original Message-----
From: freeradius-users-bounces+jkuhne=cisco.com at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+jkuhne=cisco.com at lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of Arran Cudbard-Bell
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2011 4:58 AM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: MLPPP Acct-Session-Id


On Apr 2, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:

> Jay Kuhne (jkuhne) wrote:
>> Forgot to mention, also attempted with Acct-Multi-Session-Id, which
was in the accounting record but same result.
> 
>  I would say to ask the NAS manufacturer for a list of what they need 
> in the CoA packet, but that doesn't seem to apply here.
> 
>  I'm not sure why CoA is so complicated.  If there's an 
> Acct-Session-Id attribute, the NAS should use that to identify a 
> session.  Pretty much every other "session identification" attribute
can be ignored.
> 

Some NAS manufacturers require multiple Identification attributes, you
really need to ask the manufacturer what attributes and values are
required to identify a session. Sometimes you also need a minimum number
of policy attributes in addition to the identification attributes. CoA
doesn't differentiate between the two types at a packet level its
completely implementation specific.

-Arran
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html




More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list