Mixed Environment Question

Paul Stewart paul at paulstewart.org
Mon Jan 30 21:10:53 CET 2012


Thanks so much for that info. I did roll a ticket with Juniper and will
follow up with them.  If anything of substance comes out of this I'll be
sure to share back to the list for other Juniper users to benefit from ;)

 

Paul

 

 

From: freeradius-users-bounces+paul=paulstewart.org at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+paul=paulstewart.org at lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of Arran Cudbard-Bell
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 2:29 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Mixed Environment Question

 

Hi Paul,

 

Just double checked and found this is actually only a 'must' requirement for
servers, unfortunately the requirements for clients are that they 'should'
ignore unknown VSAs and attributes of an unknown type. I'm not entirely sure
why that is, seems pretty dumb to me to reject a user if the packet contains
VSAs from another vendor.

 

Honestly this is probably a bug in Juniper's RADIUS client implementation.
We found a similar one in HP ProCurve's where the attribute offset wouldn't
be incremented properly if a VSA was found with a non HP vendor ID... oops.

 

Apologies for the slightly incorrect info.

 

Best Regards,

Arran

 

On 30 Jan 2012, at 19:39, Paul Stewart wrote:





Thank you for answering that question 100% - much appreciated.

 

I will roll a ticket with Juniper as their MX series in my testing does
*not* ignore additional VSA's - I just proved it out in our lab. Their ERX
series in particular does ignore additional VSA's and a Cisco 7206VXR I just
tested as well ignores them perfectly.

 

Cheers,

 

Paul

 

 

From: freeradius-users-bounces+paul=paulstewart.org at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+paul=paulstewart.org at lists.freeradius.org]
On Behalf Of Arran Cudbard-Bell
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 1:18 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Re: Mixed Environment Question

 

 

 

So far I have tested this on a Juniper ERX and it simply ignores the Cisco
attributes, which was what I'm hoping for.

 

 

It has to according to RFC 2865, if it doesn't open a support call with
Juniper.

 

I plan to float some Juniper attributes towards some Cisco gear at some
point to see how it handles it.  Anyone have much practical experience with
this?  Is it expected to always ignore additional VSA's or is it a 'crap
shoot' depending on the vendor?

 

Stick VSAs from as many different vendors as you want in the Reply. The NAS
*MUST* ignore attributes that it can't process, it's one of the fundamentals
of the RADIUS protocol.

-Arran

 

 

Arran Cudbard-Bell
a.cudbardb at freeradius.org

Betelwiki, Betelwiki, Betelwiki.... http://wiki.freeradius.org/ !

 

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

 

Arran Cudbard-Bell
a.cudbardb at freeradius.org

Betelwiki, Betelwiki, Betelwiki.... http://wiki.freeradius.org/ !

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20120130/94c9904a/attachment.html>


More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list