Policy.conf - multiple @

[Arran Cudbard-Bell]

On 28 Nov 2012, at 15:08, alan buxey <A.L.M.Buxey at LBORO.AC.UK> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> That's not quite the same, as it would match more than the original
>> regex. OK the parenthesis aren't needed, however consider the following
>> username:
>> 
>> bob@@realm
> 
> that would be a wrong and illegal entry...so needs to be rejected too.

When ya'll decided what you want the regexps to be, send a pull request? :)

-Arran