Operator ":=" in reply packets

[Axel Luttgens]

Le 21 août 2014 à 13:45, Alan DeKok a écrit :

> [...]
>  The issue is that the operators don't look at the new attributes being
> added.  They only apply to the attributes in the original list.

Hello Alan,

Many tanks for your reply.

Should "issue" be understood as "explanation", so that one is facing an intended behavior?
Or does "issue" really mean "issue"?

If the latter, I am correct at believing that operator "+=" would be logically better suited for building those duplicate Reply-Messages?

Axel