New RHEL and Fedora package maintainer
jdennis at redhat.com
Fri May 23 23:40:14 CEST 2014
On 05/23/2014 04:53 PM, Stefan Paetow wrote:
> It could be a question for EPEL (because that's what EPEL effectively
> is… a repo for things that move faster than the distributions) then,
> although this might get vetoed on the basis that it could/would clash
> with the official distribution packages.
Sorry, that's not permitted for exactly the reason you cite, EPEL cannot
contain packages already packaged for RHEL.
More information about the Freeradius-Users