post-proxy and detecting dead upstream realms

[Phil Mayers]

On 15/01/15 15:27, A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> "Real" cause of this message are something to worry about. In
>> particular, on some current equipment (cough Cisco cough) those
>> messages might indicate you're very close to the "offered load of
>
> thats the main issue. at least on the new releases they have a seperate
> 255 for the accounting datagrams.... I dont see why they dont use a different
> NAS-Port for each access point on the controller...that would be a nice simple
> solution

NAS-Port? How would changing the RADIUS attribute help, surely the 
packet IDs would still be limited to 255?

Really they just need to open new UDP sockets when they've exhausted 
IDs. It's not rocket science... ;o)