Issue with intermediate CAs

Arran Cudbard-Bell a.cudbardb at freeradius.org
Tue Jun 23 16:52:24 CEST 2015


> On Jun 23, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb at freeradius.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jun 23, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Ben Humpert <ben at an3k.de> wrote:
>>> OpenSSL ... To me it looks like they ignore more or less tiny bugs in
>>> their code and just focus on encryption, ciphers, etc. Is GnuTLS
>>> better?
>> 
>> Not really.  The API is a bit better, but it implements less of the TLS specs.
> 
> ...and extrapolating from my limited contact, the developers are assholes.
> 
> When told we wouldn't be giving one GnuTLS dev commit access to the RADIUS client library repo, he promptly deleted all his pull requests, meaning we couldn't merge the code.

or more the branches the pull requests were based on.

-Arran
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20150623/3f9781c0/attachment.sig>


More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list