Multiple access-request + access-accept packets in one conversation.

Vlad Kratsberg vkratsberg at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 22:54:21 CEST 2016


Thanks,

I will try upgrading to version 3.1.

Could the certificate be the reason for re-negotiation over and over again
?

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>
wrote:

> On Jun 1, 2016, at 4:23 PM, Vlad Kratsberg <vkratsberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for response.  Below are mine cache configurations and i actually
> > see .vps and .asn1 entries created in /var/log/radius/tlscache/.
>
>   The debug log you posted shows that "persist_dir" wasn't configured, and
> that it wasn't caching entries.
>
> > cache
> >                        enable = yes
> >                        max_entries = 255
> >                        name = "EAP module"
> >                        persist_dir = "${logdir}/tlscache"
> >                }
> >
> > .vps files only contain User-Name attribute.
> >
> > So is this a know issue where 3.0.X doesn't cache all atributes ?
>
>   Yes.
>
>   You will need to set Cached-Session-Policy in the original reply.
>
>   It will then be copied to the reply of the resumed session.  You can use
> key off of that to figure out which reply attributes to send back.
>
>   It's not perfect, by any means.
>
>   To be honest, you might just try upgrading to v3.1.x from github.  The
> caching is a *lot* cleaner there.
>
> > Is this
> > related to the fact that conversation between client and server becoming
> > too long during renegotiation ?
>
>   No.  The re-negotiation isn't long.  It jus re-negotiates over and over
> and over.
>
>   Alan DeKok.
>
>
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
> http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
>


More information about the Freeradius-Users mailing list