Problem with multiple LDAP servers
a.cudbardb at freeradius.org
Wed May 4 17:05:17 CEST 2016
> On 4 May 2016, at 05:19, Jonathan Gazeley <Jonathan.Gazeley at bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 04/05/16 13:15, A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk wrote:
>>> Don't worry folks - this isn't a repeat of the same question about
>>> multiple LDAP servers. I've read the docs and I know how it's
>>> *supposed* to work, but I think I've found a discrepancy in the
>>> messages printed by the server. I'm running FreeRADIUS 3.0.11.
>> you ge the same with 3.1.x - if defined in one line you get that same warning
>> message. havent had time to look at the 'correct' way that the server suggests
>> yet...which is multiple 'server' lines - which as you say seems to not work
>> at all as expected - as I havent looked into it, I havent submitted a bug on github.
> Looks like Arran was talking about the new syntax at least in April 2015:
> Arran, what counts as "later versions of FreeRADIUS 3"?
I think the multi instance validation was added after the rlm_ldap code was changed. I've pushed a fix for v3.0.x.
I'm going to drop the legacy support from v3.1.x.
Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb at freeradius.org>
FreeRADIUS Development Team
FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 872 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
More information about the Freeradius-Users