Issue 2828 and building against atomics.
matt.s at aptalaska.net
Fri Nov 15 21:31:34 CET 2019
On 11/15/19 11:50 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2019, at 2:35 PM, Matthew Schumacher <matt.s at aptalaska.net> wrote:
>> If I revert the patch, it doesn't link against libatomic and thus I no longer have this dependency. Alan suggested installing libatomic as the solution, and while I can make a package for that, I don't understand what I would be loosing by omitting -latomic from the linker and building without it. Can someone explain why I shouldn't just revert the patch in my build script and eliminate this dependency?
> If you revert the patch and it still works, go for it.
> But many platforms require libatomic in order to do atomic operations.
> Alan DeKok.
Okay, thanks for the info.
More information about the Freeradius-Users