<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
David N'DAKPAZE wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:16ad49990903301241y8c92b1s4119f62aa6201de6@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div>I am re-intalling freeradius and when I run make after
./configure --disable-shared I have this:</div>
</blockquote>
Don't make matters worse by trying to defeat loadable modules. Go back
and figure out why the loader can't find the modules. A good place to
start is looking to see what libdir was defined as when you ran
configure and/or look to see where the modules were installed when you
ran "make install" (should be the same place and by default is
/usr/lib/freeradius). Are the modules there? Was rpath set when the
modules were linked? Was ldconfig run so the loader knows where to find
them?<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:16ad49990903301241y8c92b1s4119f62aa6201de6@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">>radiusd: #### Instantiating modules ####<br>
> instantiate {<br>
>/usr/local/etc/raddb/modules/exec[24]: Failed to link to module<br>
>'rlm_exec': rlm_exec.a: cannot open shared object file: No such file<br>
>or directory<br>
>Errors initializing modules<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>
Same applies to *any* missing library.If your linker doesn't have the<br>
correct path it doesn't matter what's the library called.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
John Dennis <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jdennis@redhat.com"><jdennis@redhat.com></a>
Looking to carve out IT costs?
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/">www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>