<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Thanks Alan, I'd just noted that same advice in one of your responses earlier today. I'll certainly be taking a look.<br><br>Thanks much for your time!<br>-Benjamin<br><br>> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:41:49 +0100<br>> From: aland@deployingradius.com<br>> To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org<br>> Subject: Re: Forwarding/Logging Accounting to another Radius server without proxyþ<br>> <br>> Benjamin Marvin wrote:<br>> > I've noted the RFCs list the following:<br>> <br>> Who reads those things? :)<br>> <br>> > So my question is:<br>> > Does FreeRadius have built in support for taking responsibility of Accounting retransmission? <br>> <br>> No. It's up to the NAS to retransmit.<br>> <br>> > I currently proxy to an upstream vendor on the off-chance my customers use their services while connected to a servicing NAS.<br>> <br>> What does that mean?<br>> <br>> > Accounting turn-around with t!
hem is not robust so a NAS gener!<br>> > ates a truck load of duplicates then wonders why the accounting server hasn't responded. Optimally, my own Server would reply and then generate a new accounting record for my upstream vendor. Also, with the current setup, if the upstream vendor goes offline, my NAS will continue duplicating accounting records until timeout.<br>> > <br>> > I don't control all the connecting NASes so I can't tell them to wait longer. Overall, it seems simpler to cut the upstream vendor out of the middle of my accounting stream.<br>> <br>> See raddb/sites-available/copy-acct-to-home-server<br>> <br>> Alan DeKok.<br>> -<br>> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html<br> <br /><hr />Hotmail: un servizio di posta elettronica gratuito, sicuro e ricco di funzioni. <a href='https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969' target='_new'>Provalo subito.</a></body>
</html>