<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Hi there…<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thank you to those folks to helped me recently understanding the Juniper attributes etc – much appreciated.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>What is the practical issues with a users file entry that is mixing vendor attributes? Ie.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>pstewart-stat Auth-Type = System<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> Service-Type = Framed,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> Framed-Protocol = PPP,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> Framed-IP-Address = xxx.xxx.xxx.73,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:interface-config#2=rate-limit output 512000 375000 512000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop",<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> Cisco-AVPair = "lcp:interface-config#1=rate-limit input 512000 375000 512000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop",<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> ERX-Ingress-Policy-Name = lite,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> ERX-Egress-Policy-Name = lite<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So far I have tested this on a Juniper ERX and it simply ignores the Cisco attributes, which was what I’m hoping for.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I plan to float some Juniper attributes towards some Cisco gear at some point to see how it handles it. Anyone have much practical experience with this? Is it expected to always ignore additional VSA’s or is it a ‘crap shoot’ depending on the vendor?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>We have customers that sometimes will connect to Cisco for example, but could also connect that same username to a Juniper (not at the same time, but within minutes of one another). I am trying to come up with a users file entry that keeps all vendor specific attributes in intact – am I playing with fire?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>;)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Paul<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>