<html><head></head><body><div class="gmail_quote">A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Hi,<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">My guess is dual-stack NAS->RADIUS is going to be rare.</blockquote><br />ummm. take a hold on that assertion. the joy of dual-stack deployment<br />is that you need to ensure your servers are ready on IPv4 and IPv6 - <br />and as part of that, you need to ensure that your using both methods<br />in case either your IPv4 goes...or your IPv6 goes. we use both<br />IPv4 and IPv6 on our kit...and our servers are configured for both..as<br />are our NAS kit that can do IPv6 for RADIUS (we had some discussion<br />about the best fall-over order to use..which in itself is interesting)<br /><br />my personal view is that network/sys admins who are avoiding IPv6 as much<br />as they can are just storing themselves up for a whole lot of pain later<br />when its forced onto them by internet evolution...embrace the IPv6 now<br />w!
hilst
you can do it in your own time. it not like you havent been<br />given over 15 years of advance notice ;-)<br /><br />alan<br />-<br />List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See <a href="http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html">http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html</a><br /><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br clear="all">Sorry, I've been unclear. What I meant was that I strongly suspect nas->radius comms will either be v4 or v6 for a given pairing at any one time, for periods of minutes or hours. Hence treating the addresses as separately should be fine<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my phone with, please excuse brevity and typos</body></html>