freeradius developer/user identity wrote:

Thank you for the patches, but I'm confused. If the plan is to replace radiusclient completely within a few months with code that is currently being developed, why patch the current code with patches more than a year old?

For one, the patches are still useful. There are a lot of applications using the existing freeradius-client library. It will be a *long* time before those applications get re-written. So there's still a need for updated releases.

When you announced that you would be replacing radiusclient, I assumed that a separate maintainer for the old codebase would not be needed.

The new library is *not* BSD licensed. Parts of it may be in the future. But nothing is set in stone, due to commercial / legal issues. And those are largely out of my control. Having an updated freeradius-client library would be valuable. Alan DeKok.