Yves Deuscher wrote:You'll have to look at the rest of the debug log to see what's going on.
> For DEP commissioned the first connection goes well
>
>
> Thu Jan 30 23:48:28 2014 : Info: ++[eap] returns noop
> Thu Jan 30 23:48:28 2014 : Info: ++[unix] returns updated
> Thu Jan 30 23:48:28 2014 : Info: [files] expand:
> %{Client-Shortname} -> DEP25
> Thu Jan 30 23:48:28 2014 : Info: [files] users: Matched entry DEFAULT at
> line 208
> Thu Jan 30 23:48:28 2014 : Info: ++[files] returns ok
If the packets are being processed differently, it's because the
packets are different. You'll have to look at the packets to see what's
different. Then, re-write the rules to match both packets.
Each packet is completely independent. FreeRADIUS doesn't change it's
> I miss something for the dynamic substitution takes place at each
> connection or I can not be the problem taken in the right direction have?
behavior from one packet to the next.
Follow the EAP guide on http://deployingradius.com/ . It *will* work.
> More I try to configure a secure WPA / TTLS working with all key
> calculated installing Freeradius. by cons with mine I have a CA_unknown
> error do you have a clue?
If you have unknown CA errors, it's because the certificate
configuration is wrong. Follow the guide.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html