So to understand you right:

Every user that should be authenticated has to be an entry in the users file?

Isn’t it possible to add an forwarding for every user so that all requests are just forwarded and checked?

If not I must add all users from the AD to the users file, mustn’t I?

Von: freeradius-users-bounces+frederik.niedernolte=bertelsmann.de@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+frederik.niedernolte=bertelsmann.de@lists.freeradius.org] Im Auftrag von Syed Anwarul Hasan
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2008 13:16
An: FreeRadius users mailing list
Betreff: Re: Problem with ntlm_auth

And also don't remove ntlm_auth from authenticate section of both default and inner-tunnel files.

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Syed Anwarul Hasan <syedanwarulhasan2007@gmail.com> wrote:

Ok, Where are USER CREDENTIALS stored, the one descibed in the Manual is Bind as User. That is USer Entry is added in Users file and after using ntlm_auth, it is checked against a Active Directory or LDAP server backend using NT Lan manager Authentication Protocol.

For example:
Users file:
User Auth-Type :- ntlm_auth

In Active Directory
User should be a member.

So, then ntlm_auth requests will be passed from your Server to Active Directory or LDAP Server.

Otherwise you will not setup ntlm_auth.

SYED

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:58 PM, <Frederik.Niedernolte@bertelsmann.de> wrote:

OK, I have tested it with "radtest MyUser MyPassword localhost 0 testing123" and this is what the server gave back:

Ready to process requests.

rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 127.0.0.1 port 32793, id=92, length=58

User-Name = "MyUser"

User-Password = "MyPassword"

NAS-IP-Address = IP.OF.THE.SERVER

NAS-Port = 0

+- entering group authorize {...}

++[preprocess] returns ok

++[chap] returns noop

++[mschap] returns noop

[suffix] No '@' in User-Name = "MyUser", looking up realm NULL

[suffix] No such realm "NULL"

++[suffix] returns noop

[eap] No EAP-Message, not doing EAP

++[eap] returns noop

++[unix] returns notfound

++[files] returns noop

++[expiration] returns noop

++[logintime] returns noop

[pap] WARNING! No "known good" password found for the user. Authentication may fail because of this.

++[pap] returns noop

No authenticate method (Auth-Type) configuration found for the request: Rejecting the user

Failed to authenticate the user.

Using Post-Auth-Type Reject

+- entering group REJECT {...}

[attr_filter.access_reject] expand: %{User-Name} -> MyUser

attr_filter: Matched entry DEFAULT at line 11

++[attr_filter.access_reject] returns updated

Delaying reject of request 0 for 1 seconds

Going to the next request

Waking up in 0.9 seconds.

Sending delayed reject for request 0

Sending Access-Reject of id 92 to 127.0.0.1 port 32793

Waking up in 4.9 seconds.

Cleaning up request 0 ID 92 with timestamp +3710

Ready to process requests.

Now what should I do?
Thanks in advance.

An: FreeRadius users mailing list
Betreff: Re: Problem with ntlm_auth

Hi,
You can use radtest tool to check with the Server.The Server will return accept-accept message.
Other tool includes JRadius Simulator as IVAN told. bu I have not used it.
Otherwise If you have a Native PEAP or TTLS client, you can sent MSCHAP requests to use ntlm_auth with Active DIRECTORY or LDAP server backend.(if you have)

SYED

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:54 AM, <Frederik.Niedernolte@bertelsmann.de> wrote:

Thanks, now it works :)

Now the last step: How can I test it? What tool/program etc. can/should I use to test it?

"The radclient cannot currently be used to send this request, unfortunately, which makes testing a little difficult If everything goes well, you should see the server returning an Access-Accept message as above."

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards

Frederik Niedernolte
-------------------------------------------------------
arvato services
An der Autobahn
33310 Gütersloh
Germany
http://www.arvato-services.de
frederik.niedernolte@bertelsmann.de
Tel.: +49 (0)5241 80-40554

arvato services GmbH: Sitz Gütersloh | Amtsgericht Gütersloh HRB 3826 | Geschäftsführer Ralf Bierfischer, Bodo Krönfeld, Markus Schmedtmann, Eckhard Südmersen

Von: freeradius-users-bounces+frederik.niedernolte=bertelsmann.de@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+frederik.niedernolte=bertelsmann.de@lists.freeradius.org] Im Auftrag von Syed Anwarul Hasan
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2008 11:44
An: FreeRadius users mailing list
Betreff: Re: Problem with ntlm_auth

Hi Frederik,

1) Put User entry on TOP of users file.
2) In default file, in authenticate section, add ntlm_auth. Don't set using Auth-Type.
3) Also in Sites-enabled/inner-tunnel which is Virtual Server Inner Tunnel. Add ntlm_auth in Authenticate Section.

I hope it will solve your problem.
SYED

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:17 AM, <Frederik.Niedernolte@bertelsmann.de> wrote:

I have finished all steps till „user Auth-Type := ntlm_auth" from http://deployingradius.com/documents/configuration/active_directory.html.

With this command I get this error message at the end of "/usr/sbin/freeradius –X":

/etc/freeradius/users[1]: Parse error (check) for entry MyUser: Unknown value ntlm_auth for attribute Auth-Type

Errors reading /etc/freeradius/users

/etc/freeradius/modules/files[7]: Instantiation failed for module "files"

/etc/freeradius/sites-enabled/inner-tunnel[111]: Failed to find module "files".

/etc/freeradius/sites-enabled/inner-tunnel[34]: Errors parsing authorize section.

}

Errors initializing modules

The authenticate section in the /etc/freeradius/sites-enabled/default looks like this (only important part):

authenticate {

# NTML_AUTH authentication.

Auth-Type ntlm_auth {

ntlm_auth

}

What is wrong and what can I do to solve the problem?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards, F. Niedernolte

-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html