Jake,

I sent a same message on Packet Fence list.

Tks Marlon

2011/8/25 Sallee, Stephen (Jake) <Jake.Sallee@umhb.edu>

I just finished a deployment that did exactly that!  This may be a subject more suited for their mailing list (which I am on as well).

 

Message me on that list and I bet we can get you working. I only say this because from what you say FreeRADIUS is sending the correct radius attributes back, if that is the case then FR is doing its job perfectly and the problem likely lies with your NAS.

 

 

Jake Sallee

Godfather of Bandwidth

System Engineer

University of Mary Hardin-Baylor

900 College St.

Belton, Texas

76513

Fone: 254-295-4658

Phax: 254-295-4221

 

From: freeradius-users-bounces+jake.sallee=umhb.edu@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+jake.sallee=umhb.edu@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Marlon Bastida
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 9:16 PM
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Subject: Packet Fence web interface and freeradius users

 

Hi,

 

I have 3 radius users working on freeradius. I will give one sample:

 

On /etc/raddb/users

 

test    Cleartext-Password:="test"

        Service-Type = Framed-User,

        Tunnel-Type = VLAN,

        Tunnel-Medium-Type = IEEE-802,

        Tunnel-Private-Group-ID = "2" 

 

When I enter with this user credentials on Xp client 802.1X auth they give to the proper VLAN assigned. For example I have  VLAN-ID = 2 - registration, 3 - isolation, 5 - guests, 10 - normal. 

 

So with the statement Tunnel-Private-Group-ID = VLAN-ID, I can't get succesfully put a user on the proper VLAN, in this case above entered on registration VLAN.

 

If anyone has acknowledge with Packet Fence solution I would like some help to integrate these users with web interface of Packet Fence 2.1.0. So I can get on the Violation Tab (isolation VLAN) an user or Node Tab (guests VLAN).

 

 

Tks in advance,

Marlon


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html