If I understand you correctly – I respectfully submit you are incorrect.  When using VLSM / classless masks to define a NETWORK, you are correct (I haven’t checked the math – just assuming you are correct).  However, when defining ACL type stuff, the proposed /29 would be perfectly OK.  That said, I’m speaking strictly of my experience with routers, firewalls, etc.  If FR supports this I can’t say for sure.

 

From: freeradius-users-bounces+ggatten=waddell.com@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+ggatten=waddell.com@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Magui
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:39 PM
To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
Subject: Re:NAS IPs

 

you can not to use /29 for 8 IPs because 3 bits have exactly 8 combination ,..x000 is the network and ...x111 is the difusion ,then really you have 6 IPs with /29, you need /28 16 combinations minus two,min 14 IPs for 8 numbers.

"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system."