Maybe a 1.1.0?

[Thor Spruyt]

Alan DeKok wrote:
> Nicolas Baradakis <nbk at sitadelle.com> wrote:
>> I'd prefer 1.1.0 rather than 1.0.6, even if I don't like branches of
>> branches in CVS.
>
>   Yeah, I agree.
>
>> There many, many changes in CVS that may go in 1.1.0. I can't tell
>> all of them, but it includes: newer autotools, {Pre,Post}-Proxy-Type
>> stanzas, support of ${Cisco-AVPair[n]} syntax, -n and -p options in
>> radclient, changes in rlm_attr_filter, new rlm_sql_log &
>> radsqlrelay...
>
>   I'm OK with putting in things that are easy.  If it's hard, let's
> punt.
>
>   So newer autotools make me nervous, but much of the rest of what you
> said sounds OK.
>

It would be a good idea to start releasing beta versions to overcome the
"nervosity".

1.1.0 = beta
1.1.1 = stable
1.1.2 = beta
1.1.3 = stable
2.0.0 = beta
2.0.1 = stable
...


--
Groeten, Regards, Salutations,

Thor Spruyt
M: +32 (0)475 67 22 65
E: thor.spruyt at telenet.be
W: www.thor-spruyt.com

www.salesguide.be
www.telenethotspot.be