thor.spruyt at telenet.be
Thu Jul 28 19:13:44 CEST 2005
Paul Hampson wrote:
>> Would you include a fix for Exec-Program-Wait (see below)? If
>> needed, I can submit it on bugs.freeradius.org
> Can we instead nuke Exec-Program and Exec-Program-Wait? Are there any
> more cases they handle that rlm_exec does not?
> I didn't port the rlm_exec return values changes to Exec-Program-Wait,
> because they're to do with the configurable failover, and the
> Exec-Program calls are done after that's no longer relevant.
> And because I'd like to see Exec-Program nuked. ^_^
Well, I experimented with rlm_exec half a year ago, and I didn't found it
suitable for my needs, where Exec-Program and Exec-Program-Wait did!
I would suggest deprecating them, but not removing, so to give people time
to move to rlm_exec or rlm_perl (when is that finaly going to be stable?).
When I have time, I'll try rlm_exec again to see if things have changed in
the right direction.
Groeten, Regards, Salutations,
M: +32 (0)475 67 22 65
E: thor.spruyt at telenet.be
More information about the Freeradius-Devel