Adding strlcpy and strlcat replacements to libradius

Alan DeKok aland at
Tue Oct 4 17:29:04 CEST 2005

Paul TBBle Hampson <Paul.Hampson at> wrote:
> > Yes. And make -devel binary packages..
> And people could build modules outside the tree without needing the
> whole source... ^_^

  That would involve fixing the headers to avoid things like #ifdef
HAVE_FOO.  I don't want to make the same mistake the net-snmp people did.

> I'm starting to think we should skip 2.0 and go straight to 3.0...

  I'd like to go to 2.0 first.  The proxy code needs fixing, and the
realms need updating.  I'm still waiting for the patch from

  I think we should release 2.0 before Christmas, and target 3.0 for
next summer.  Maybe this time we can have a schedule we can stick to.

  Alan DeKok.

More information about the Freeradius-Devel mailing list