Release 1.0.5?

[Nicolas Baradakis]

Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:

> > The fix for ldap_pairget (bug #261) has been commited to CVS head
> > however I'm not using LDAP, so I can't test it. I'm waiting to receive
> > feedback before adding the patch to branch 1.0. This bug isn't blocker
> > for 1.0.5 anyway, there is no need to delay the release for that.
> 
> If we've documented it as working the way you've fixed it to work,
> it prolly should go in. If we've not done so, then don't worry about
> it until you're well satisfied.

It's not explicit in doc/rlm_ldap or doc/ldap_howto.txt, but the strings
from LDAP are not supposed to be truncated. (for example, strings from
MySQL aren't truncated)

My problem is that the reporter of the bug is silent, therefore I'm not
inclined to add an untested fix in 1.0.5.

It's the same for bug #138 (rlm_sql_iodbc). No answer from the reporter
of the bug. I have a patch but I can't test it. Therefore the fix won't
be in 1.0.5 either.

> I'll leave it until Monday, and then if there's no other changes, tag it
> and we can ship it. ^_^

It's a good thing if the CVS is tagged, so it's possible to release
1.0.5 anytime. However, the date of the release is still unknown. We
have to wait a little more, as Alan is working on an official statement
with other vendors.

> And let's hope _this_ is the last 1.0.x release. -_-

Yes.

-- 
Nicolas Baradakis