rlm_sqlippool IPR (was: Automatic report from sources (radiusd) between 13.09.2005 - 14.09.2005 GMT)
aland at ox.org
Thu Sep 15 21:12:42 CEST 2005
Frank Cusack <fcusack at fcusack.com> wrote:
> You can't know for sure how Globe.Net intended to license the software,
> especially given their demonstrated naÃ¯vete made clear by their failure
> to specify license terms in their source.
They requested that the code be submitted to a project that they
knew was licensed under the GPL.
> If they decide they didn't know inclusion meant GPL (or change
> their mind down the road and claim ignorance), you can be sure the
> legal battle will be hell.
I don't think so. But that's my $0.02.
> You really must have explicit license terms in order to include sql_ippool
> (or any contrib software).
For one-line patches?
If that was a serious worry, then nearly every GPL'd project would
be vulnerable to the same issues.
I'm not worried about it too much.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel