proxy accounting in cvs
jmaimon at ttec.com
Thu Sep 29 01:28:49 CEST 2005
Alan DeKok wrote:
> Joe Maimon <jmaimon at ttec.com> wrote:
>>And this little hack into proxy.c:487 fixes accounting....
> OK, thanks. Your other issues from yesterday should be fixed in
> today's CVS.
Ive seen it, not tried it yet. Thanks.
>>which truly stinks and something better should be done, such as take the
>>first address bound to, accept a src_ip/interface argument in
> Or in a "listen" section, which is the preferred method.
> That may not be hard to add, and I'll see what I can do.
> Alan DeKok.
How does the concept of choosing which address to source packets proxied
fit in with the concept of choosing which address/port to accept request?
Unlike in the hack I exampled there is no real reason to tie them together.
Also conceivably an admin might appreciate being able to specify
different src addr/ports for different realms.
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
More information about the Freeradius-Devel