proxy accounting in cvs

[Joe Maimon]

Alan DeKok wrote:

> Joe Maimon <jmaimon at ttec.com> wrote:
> 
>>And this little hack into proxy.c:487 fixes accounting....
> 
> 
>   OK, thanks.  Your other issues from yesterday should be fixed in
> today's CVS.

Ive seen it, not tried it yet. Thanks.

> 
> 
>>which truly stinks and something better should be done, such as take the 
>>first address bound to, accept a src_ip/interface argument in 
>>proxy.conf.......
> 
> 
>   Or in a "listen" section, which is the preferred method.
> 
>   That may not be hard to add, and I'll see what I can do.
> 
>   Alan DeKok.
> 

How does the concept of choosing which address to source packets proxied 
  fit in with the concept of choosing which address/port to accept request?

Unlike in the hack I exampled there is no real reason to tie them together.

Also conceivably an admin might appreciate being able to specify 
different src addr/ports for different realms.



> - 
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
> 
>